🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for lobbying against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting modifications of a draft bill that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during wider concerns about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

In the letter, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “following international recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for various offences “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.