🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually experienced the burden of her parent’s reputation. Being the child of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous UK musicians of the early 20th century, Avril’s reputation was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of history.

An Inaugural Recording

Earlier this year, I sat with these memories as I got ready to record the first-ever recording of Avril’s 1936 piano concerto. Featuring emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and bold rhythms, Avril’s work will provide audiences fascinating insight into how the composer – an artist in conflict who entered the world in 1903 – imagined her reality as a female composer of color.

Legacy and Reality

Yet about legacies. It can take a while to adjust, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to tell reality from misinterpretation, and I had been afraid to confront her history for a while.

I earnestly desired the composer to be following in her father’s footsteps. Partially, that held. The rustic British sounds of her father’s impact can be observed in many of her works, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only review the titles of her parent’s works to understand how he viewed himself as not only a flag bearer of English Romanticism but a voice of the African heritage.

This was where parent and child began to differ.

American society evaluated Samuel by the excellence of his art instead of the his racial background.

Parental Heritage

During his studies at the Royal College of Music, Samuel – the offspring of a parent from Sierra Leone and a British mother – turned toward his heritage. When the Black American writer this literary figure arrived in England in that era, the 21-year-old composer eagerly sought him out. He adapted this literary work as a composition and the following year incorporated his poetry for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral piece that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Inspired by this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt shared pride as white America evaluated the composer by the quality of his art rather than the his background.

Advocacy and Beliefs

Recognition did not reduce his beliefs. In 1900, he attended the initial Pan African gathering in London where he encountered the Black American thinker WEB Du Bois and observed a variety of discussions, such as the oppression of African people in South Africa. He was an activist to his final days. He sustained relationships with early civil rights leaders like this intellectual and Booker T Washington, spoke publicly on equality for all, and even discussed issues of racism with the American leader during an invitation to the presidential residence in 1904. As for his music, Du Bois recalled, “he made his mark so notably as a musician that it will long be remembered.” He died in that year, in his thirties. Yet how might her father have thought of his offspring’s move to be in South Africa in the mid-20th century?

Issues and Stance

“Daughter of Famous Composer expresses approval to South African policy,” declared a title in the community journal Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the correct approach”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she qualified her remarks: she didn’t agree with apartheid “fundamentally” and it “could be left to resolve itself, directed by good-intentioned South Africans of diverse ethnicities”. Were the composer more aligned to her parent’s beliefs, or born in segregated America, she could have hesitated about the policy. However, existence had sheltered her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I hold a English document,” she stated, “and the government agents failed to question me about my ethnicity.” Thus, with her “light” appearance (as Jet put it), she moved alongside white society, buoyed up by their acclaim for her late father. She delivered a lecture about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and conducted the national orchestra in the city, featuring the inspiring part of her composition, titled: “In memory of my Father.” Even though a confident pianist herself, she did not perform as the soloist in her concerto. Rather, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

She desired, in her own words, she “might bring a change”. But by 1954, things fell apart. Once officials became aware of her African heritage, she could no longer stay the land. Her citizenship offered no defense, the diplomatic official recommended her departure or be jailed. She went back to the UK, feeling great shame as the scale of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a painful one,” she expressed. Increasing her humiliation was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her sudden departure from South Africa.

A Common Narrative

As I sat with these legacies, I felt a known narrative. The narrative of holding UK citizenship until you’re not – that brings to mind African-descended soldiers who defended the British throughout the second world war and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. Along with the Windrush era,