Through Ending a Cruel Tory Social Experiment, This Budget Definitively Sets Out How the Labour Party Will Wage the Battle to Renew Britain

Just recently, the finance minister, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour budget. The public have been asking for Labour’s mission and values to be more distinctly expressed. Through the choices made – a transition to a fairer tax system, targeting wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, good public services and the cost of living – we have unequivocally set out what we stand for.

This is why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the fights to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began right away.

The Central Dividing Line in UK Government

The central division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to reform it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the opposite side, our opponents, who favor the status quo and the failed doctrine of the past. We must now confront, and prevail in, the debate.

The Tories were given 14 years to resolve things and instead, by any measure, they got much worse. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (causing us with poor productivity and wages), and neglecting to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.

Record of Failure Under the Former Government

Living standards dropped by the biggest amount since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest on record, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people scarred by Covid were abandoned. The history of failure goes on.

A single budget alone can’t fix everything, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and keep making the argument for why our strategy will yield benefits.

Social Security and Child Poverty

Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, deep inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to manage the effects instead of the cure.

It’s why we are constructing more affordable homes than for a generation, increasing wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Ending the Two-Child Benefit Cap

This is also the reason we are absolutely right to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For eight long years, since it was enacted, poorer families with children have endured from a unjust social experiment that was marketed as fair for working people when it was the opposite. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.

It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.

Real Impact in Local Areas

From experience from my own district – where over 5,000 children will be raised out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in cramped, mouldy homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of deep poverty.

Long-Term Consequences of Child Poverty

Just one in four pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among affluent families. This predisposes them for the disadvantages they face during their lives: unrealized potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.

Addressing child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a long-term investment. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the £3bn cost of lifting the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.

That’s why we acted promptly in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred extra children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was vital.

The cap was a symbol to 14 years of failed rightwing ideology. Now it is abolished.

Equitable Funding for Policies

We, as Labour, can also be explicit that these measures are being paid for in a just way – from a new gambling levy, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Conclusion

Equity and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the battle of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must seize back the political megaphone and define the narrative more strongly about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve certainly done that this week.

So let’s maintain it and win this fight about how we will renew Britain and address the entrenched inequalities impeding progress.

Jennifer Bates
Jennifer Bates

Elara is a seasoned fantasy football analyst with over a decade of experience in dynasty leagues and player evaluation.